P36 · Representative solution case · Cold Chain / Industrial / Fleet

Fuel, Temperature & Sensor Telemetry

Which product or fuel losses would have been preventable with a timely, location-aware alert?

Evidence distinction: this is a representative solution case constructed from the source requirements and Mappls delivery pattern. It is not presented as a named-customer outcome unless a separate verified customer story is explicitly linked.

01 · Operating context

The decision environment and the problem to change

Temperature, fuel, chamber and equipment conditions are not continuously evidenced, creating loss, fraud and compliance exposure.

Primary operating owner

Cold Chain Head; Fuel/Operations; Quality

Economic decision

COO; Quality Director

Technical influence

IoT/Sensors; Vehicle Engineering; ERP

Why action becomes urgent

Cold-chain audit, fuel variance, product loss, regulated distribution, tanker/chamber programme, quality escalation.

02 · Before and after

Change the operating model, not only the interface

Before Mappls

Fragmented context and delayed action

Temperature, fuel, chamber and equipment conditions are not continuously evidenced, creating loss, fraud and compliance exposure.

  • Location, operational and enterprise data remain separated
  • Stakeholders make inconsistent decisions from partial context
  • Exceptions are found late and evidence is difficult to reconstruct
With Mappls

A governed location-aware decision loop

Temperature/humidity/fuel/door/chamber/CAN sensors, alerts, trip context, calibration, dashboards, APIs and audit reports.

  • One role-aware workspace in Mappls Cold Chain Control
  • Live context moves directly into the responsible workflow
  • Every decision, scenario and outcome can be measured and audited

03 · Stakeholder experience

One shared system, different role moments

Own and govern

Cold Chain Head

Own and govern

Fuel/Operations

Decide and coordinate

Quality

Decide and coordinate

COO

Decide and coordinate

Quality Director

Execute and verify

IoT/Sensors

Execute and verify

Vehicle Engineering

Execute and verify

ERP

Inside Mappls Pro, the same user can hold this role here and a different role in another application. Membership, saved runs and administration remain app-specific.

04 · Day-in-the-life journey

How the solution turns information into an operational result

01

Frame the operating decision

Sensor ranges and calibration? Excursion rules? Who responds? What proof is needed for customers/regulators?

02

Connect the location foundation

Bring the required map, address, road, place, imagery, asset, customer and operational data into a governed Cold Chain workspace.

03

Act through role workflows

Live condition, Excursions, Shipments, Compliance, Devices give each stakeholder the information, decision and action appropriate to their role.

04

Prove the intervention

Instrument representative vehicles/boxes/tanks and run live excursion and response workflow.

05

Scale and continuously improve

Operationalise the model through Hardware/sensor + per-asset SaaS + calibration/support., adoption governance, service measurement and a managed improvement backlog.

05 · Solution and data architecture

The Mappls capabilities behind the experience

Location foundation

Map, address, place, route, imagery, boundary and context layers

Operational context

Customer, asset, order, sensor, incident, task or transaction records

Application workflow

Live condition · Excursions · Shipments · Compliance · Devices

Outcome loop

Sensor accuracy and data availability accepted; alert-to-action SLA met; loss/compliance case quantified.

Sensor Telemetry

Temperature, fuel, door, chamber, CAN and environment sensors

Product details

2D/3D Digital Twin

Operational 2D/3D spatial layer linked to live and enterprise data

Product details

InTouch / Gtropy Fleet Platform

Tracking, trips, alerts, ETA, fleet and control tower

Product details

Asset & Personal Trackers

Battery/portable/asset location and alert devices

Product details

06 · Outcome and evidence

Make the value claim measurable before scaling

Value hypothesisLower spoilage and fuel leakage; faster exception response; stronger compliance evidence and asset performance.
Success criteriaSensor accuracy and data availability accepted; alert-to-action SLA met; loss/compliance case quantified.

Bounded proof

Instrument representative vehicles/boxes/tanks and run live excursion and response workflow.

  • Confirm the baseline and decision scope: Sensor ranges and calibration? Excursion rules? Who responds? What proof is needed for customers/regulators?
  • Use representative and, where approved, customer data in the configured workspace
  • Review measurable success with the operating and economic owners: Sensor accuracy and data availability accepted; alert-to-action SLA met; loss/compliance case quantified.
  • Document data quality, adoption, security, service and scale findings
  • Convert evidence into a phased production scope and accountable value plan

07 · Governance and scale

Operate the solution safely and sustainably

Identity and access

Server-enforced identity, least-privilege app membership, role-specific actions and auditable administration.

Data governance

Source lineage, quality thresholds, update cadence, retention, consent and controlled data sharing.

Operating governance

Named process owners, exception SLAs, escalation, change control and adoption measurement.

Value governance

Baseline, intervention and outcome metrics reviewed on an agreed cadence with accountable owners.

Your outcome, powered by Mappls

Put Fuel, Temperature & Sensor Telemetry into your operating context

Bring the baseline, workflow, users, data and success criteria. Mappls will shape a bounded proof and production path.

Talk to an expert