Primary operating owner
Programme Director; Operations/C2; Naval/Maritime Intelligence
P60 · Representative solution case · Defence / Maritime / Security
How much operator time and decision latency comes from reconciling tracks, charts, weather and intelligence across systems?
Evidence distinction: this is a representative solution case constructed from the source requirements and Mappls delivery pattern. It is not presented as a named-customer outcome unless a separate verified customer story is explicitly linked.
01 · Operating context
Operational tracks, charts, intelligence, weather/ocean and mission workflows remain split across secure systems.
Programme Director; Operations/C2; Naval/Maritime Intelligence
Service HQ/Agency Director
C4ISR Architecture; GIS; Sensors; Cybersecurity
C2 modernisation, chart/system upgrade, sensor integration, maritime-domain-awareness programme, sovereign platform mandate.
02 · Before and after
Operational tracks, charts, intelligence, weather/ocean and mission workflows remain split across secure systems.
Secure maritime/mission GIS, S-63/S-57 charts, multi-sensor track fusion, common operating picture, alerts, weather/ocean layers, imagery/AI and air-gapped integration.
03 · Stakeholder experience
Programme Director
Operations/C2
Naval/Maritime Intelligence
Service HQ/Agency Director
C4ISR Architecture
GIS
Sensors
Cybersecurity
Inside Mappls Pro, the same user can hold this role here and a different role in another application. Membership, saved runs and administration remain app-specific.
04 · Day-in-the-life journey
Which sources, standards, classifications and latency rules apply? What decisions and ATP criteria matter?
Bring the required map, address, road, place, imagery, asset, customer and operational data into a governed Public Safety workspace.
Incident board, Dispatch, Live units, Response map, After action give each stakeholder the information, decision and action appropriate to their role.
Classified lab/site pilot integrating approved representative feeds and one mission workflow; NDA and need-to-know required.
Operationalise the model through Programme licence/development + integration + secure AMC/O&M., adoption governance, service measurement and a managed improvement backlog.
05 · Solution and data architecture
Map, address, place, route, imagery, boundary and context layers
Customer, asset, order, sensor, incident, task or transaction records
Incident board · Dispatch · Live units · Response map · After action
Feed/track/chart integration and latency accepted; security/ATP passed; operator workflow improvement demonstrated.
Secure map engine, APIs and GIS for private or air-gapped deployment
Product detailsGeotagged 360 imagery, photos and videos
Product detailsField survey, data creation, integration, migration, validation and O&M
Product detailsPopulation, market, administrative and customer-enriched location layers
Product details06 · Outcome and evidence
Classified lab/site pilot integrating approved representative feeds and one mission workflow; NDA and need-to-know required.
07 · Governance and scale
Server-enforced identity, least-privilege app membership, role-specific actions and auditable administration.
Source lineage, quality thresholds, update cadence, retention, consent and controlled data sharing.
Named process owners, exception SLAs, escalation, change control and adoption measurement.
Baseline, intervention and outcome metrics reviewed on an agreed cadence with accountable owners.
Your outcome, powered by Mappls
Bring the baseline, workflow, users, data and success criteria. Mappls will shape a bounded proof and production path.