Intelligent Traffic Management & Road Safety GIS

01 · Target operating outcome

Define the change before choosing the technology

Which 20 junctions or corridors create the greatest economic and safety cost—and can your current system explain why?

Business case: reduced incident clearance/travel time, higher enforcement productivity, better junction planning and improved device utilisation.

02 · Solution architecture

One connected flow from source data to operational action

Road network/map engine, device and incident layers, congestion/route analytics, junction dashboards, enforcement integration and traffic command workflows. We add the spatial intelligence layer that converts traffic devices into corridor decisions and measurable operating outcomes.

03 · Users and RBAC

Give every stakeholder the view and actions they actually need

The shared Mappls identity is separated from application membership. A user can be an administrator in one app, an analyst in another and a viewer elsewhere.

04 · Data and integration

Connect the minimum information needed to make the workflow real

Recommended Mappls building blocks

05 · Proof of value

Use a bounded implementation to answer the scale decision

6–8 week corridor/junction pilot integrating representative feeds and dashboards.

• Confirm data, geography, users and workflow: Baseline speeds/delays? Device inventory and uptime? Incident process? Violation geocoding? Signal data? Integration ownership?
• Configure Mappls Public Safety Command for the selected role set
• Run baseline and intervention scenarios with real stakeholder reviews
• Evaluate agreed criteria: Data-feed stability; map/device accuracy; baseline and improvement opportunity agreed; operator adoption; scale integration plan.
• Package production scope and commercial model: Platform/site licence + connectors + analytics + data update + AMC; partner-led when ITMS SI owns contract.

06 · Rollout and operating model

Move from proof to governed adoption